Team Approach to Improving Radiologist Wellness: A Case-Based Methodology.

Radiologist wellness is important on an individual and group/institutional level and helps to promote a strong and healthy working environment, which can improve radiologist retention and engagement. This paper will discuss case examples of radiologist wellness improvements in a single academic institution over a 3-year period using the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control) model. Leveraging this framework led to the implementation of reading room assistants, reduction in work-related injuries by improvements in ergonomics, and the formation of a faculty mentorship program.

Role of Ergonomic Improvements in Decreasing Repetitive Stress Injuries and Promoting Well-Being in a Radiology Department.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine if ergonomic improvements in a radiology department can decrease repetitive stress injuries (RSIs), advance ergonomics knowledge, and improve well-being. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists in an academic institution were surveyed regarding physician wellness, workstations, RSIs, and ergonomics knowledge before and after interventions over 1 year. Interventions included committee formation, education, wrist pads and wireless mice, broken table and chair replacement, and cord organization. Mann-Whitney U test was used for analysis. RESULTS: Survey response was 40% preinterventions (59/147), and 42% (66/157) postinterventions. Preinterventions, of radiologists with RSI history, 17/40 (42%) reported the RSI caused symptoms which can lead to burnout, and 15/40 (37%) responded their RSI made them think about leaving their job. Twenty-three of 59 (39%) radiologists had an active RSI preinterventions. Postinterventions, 9/25 (36%) RSI resolved, 13/25 (52%) RSI improved, and 3/25 (12%) RSI did not improve. RSI improvements were attributed to ergonomic interventions in 19/25 (76%) and therapy in 2/25 (8%). Radiologists who thought their workstation was designed with well-being in mind increased from 9/59 (15%) to 52/64 (81%). The percentage of radiologists knowing little or nothing about ergonomics decreased from 15/59 (25%) to 5/64 (8%). After ergonomics interventions, more radiologists thought the administration cared about safety and ergonomics, equipment was distributed fairly, and radiologists had the ability to ask for equipment (p < .01). Fifty-three of 64 (83%) of radiologists after interventions said improving workstation ergonomic design contributed to well-being. CONCLUSION: Ergonomic improvements in radiology can decrease RSIs, advance ergonomics knowledge, and improve well-being.

Imaging of Benign Hepatic lesions.

As abdominal imaging volumes have increased, the incidence of incidentally identified benign hepatic lesions has substantially increased. Familiarity with imaging appearances of benign hepatic tumors, both common and less commonly encountered, allows the radiologist to give an informed differential diagnosis. In addition to clinical history, awareness of imaging findings of benign hepatic lesions on ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is useful in evaluating these lesions and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic interventions or imaging surveillance.

Severe romiplostim-induced rebound thrombocytopenia after splenectomy for refractory ITP.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of severe rebound thrombocytopenia after temporary discontinuation of romiplostim during splenectomy in the context of refractory immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old man with a history of severe refractory ITP failing multiple treatments was considered for romiplostim therapy. He was initiated on 1 µg/kg and titrated upward to 4 µg/kg to elevate and stabilize his platelet levels prior to splenectomy. On day 74 of his clinical course, his platelets increased to 434 × 10(9)/L, and his scheduled dose of romiplostim was withheld on day 75 for fear of romiplostim-induced postsplenectomy rebound thrombocytosis. On day 78, his platelets dropped precipitously to 9 × 10(9)/L, and he experienced multiple episodes of epistaxis. He was reinitiated at 5 µg/kg and soon recovered. He later missed a scheduled dose of romiplostim, and his platelets fell to 23 × 10(9)/L. After resuming romiplostim at 8 µg/kg, his platelets continued to recover. DISCUSSION: Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin mimetic is directly regulated by megakaryocytes and existing circulating platelets via a negative feedback mechanism. This explains the theoretical risk of rapid clearance of romiplostim caused by an increased platelet pool. Clinically, alternative causes of his severe postoperative thrombocytopenia were considered and deemed unlikely. The rebound effect was observed after romiplostim was withdrawn on 2 occasions, and platelet counts improved after restarting romiplostim. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Score of 7 suggests a probable adverse drug reaction. CONCLUSION: Physicians using romiplostim as a bridge to splenectomy should be cautious about withholding a scheduled dose around the time of surgery.